Since the launch of Notebook Language Model (NotebookLM) by Google across 200 countries on June 6th, I have been dabbling in this Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) assisted note-taking browser-based application. Initially, I thought it was yet another glorified note-taking app, but I was pleasantly surprised by its enhanced capabilities, which may prove extremely useful, especially for academia, students, journalists, or knowledge workers in general.
In
this article, I'll explore the potential of NotebookLM in terms of 1.
Productivity (to curate and retrieve), 2. Discovery (to integrate and synthesise),
and 3. Collaboration (to share and cross-pollinate). Moreover, I'll share my
experience in my personal and work-related use cases.
In
Diagram 1, you can create an individual Notebook of a specific theme. Each
Notebook allows up to 50 sources of information in different formats, namely
Google Drive, PDF, TXT, URL, and Copied Text. Each source can contain up to
500,000 words. Each Notebook is allowed up to 1,000 accompanying Notes.
Diagram
1: Schematic Diagram of NotebookLM
I'm particularly fond of the "Source Grounding" feature. This ensures that all insights and summaries generated by NotebookLM are directly linked to the specific sources I've provided. This is crucial for maintaining academic rigor and ensuring the traceability of all claims. More importantly, as claimed by Google, these ground sources will not be used for training their language model.
Like
most note-taking apps, NotebookLM stores, organises, and retrieves your
database of materials of different formats in an instant. Unlike other
note-taking apps which rely on "Tagging" or assigning keywords to
different pieces of information (which can be laborious, unintuitive, and too
constricting to the assigned label, leaving no room for cross-referencing),
NotebookLM simply lets GenAI (Gemini 1.5 at the time of this writing) do its
stuff.
2.
Discovery (to integrate and synthesise)
For
instance, I once asked NotebookLM to find connections between seemingly
unrelated concepts in my research, and it provided insights that I might have
otherwise missed. As an academic writer, I'm often tasked with synthesising
information from numerous sources, identifying key themes, and drawing
connections that might not be immediately apparent. NotebookLM excels in this
area. Its "Notebook Guide" feature, for instance, can transform a
collection of sources into a structured outline, complete with FAQs and key
insights. This is an invaluable tool for quickly getting to grips with a new
body of research. Perhaps most exciting, however, is NotebookLM's ability to
suggest new ideas and connections. By analysing the sources I've provided, the
AI can propose novel perspectives or highlight areas that warrant further
exploration.
One
promising application is the facilitation of interdisciplinary research.
NotebookLM's ability to integrate and synthesise information from diverse
sources allows researchers to draw connections across fields that might
otherwise remain siloed.
3.
Collaboration (to share and cross-pollinate)
Furthermore,
academics engaged in collaborative projects will benefit from NotebookLM's
enhanced collaboration features. Teams can share notebooks containing their
respective research findings, which the AI can then analyse to identify
complementary insights or conflicting data points. This facilitates more robust
peer reviews and constructive feedback loops, ultimately enriching the quality
of the research output. The AI can then generate a collective study guide that
amalgamates everyone's inputs, ensuring comprehensive coverage of the subject
matter while accommodating different perspectives and learning styles.
As
part of a collaborative research project, I've included seven interview
transcripts and tables displaying questionnaire results. The AI's responses
will feature numbered links. Clicking on these links will reveal the specific,
relevant text excerpts from the source documents that inform the AI's answer to
your query. The responses are spot on.
1. Find
the common perceptions of these interviewees with regards to GenAI in their
learning and teaching. In your responses, name the interviewees as well as
their quotes in verbatim.
2. Find
the contradictory statements among these interviewees with regards to GenAI in
their learning and teaching. In your responses, name the interviewees as well
as their quotes in verbatim.
3. Find
any interesting and insightful comments by these interviewees with regards to
GenAi. In your responses, name the interviewees as well as their quotes in
verbatim.
4. What
are the limitations of this study? Can you suggest 3 research gaps and 3
possible future research to address the limitations and/or the research gaps?
2. Personal (Books Read and Quotes Highlighted)
I’ve
been an avid reader in the past (not so much nowadays). As a committed Amazon
Kindle reader, I’ve amassed a sizable quotes collection, which I found
insightful and interesting, from the hundreds of books I’ve read. I managed to
export this information into NotebookLM. One advantage of using NotebookLM is
that the export format need not be rigid as GenAI is able to figure out the
details.
1. These
are all the quotes I've highlighted from the books I've read over many years.
Please speculate and discern my interests and sensibility as well as what you
can tell about me.
2. Can
you select some of the most interesting quotes that are contradictory between
the different authors? Please include the citations verbatim as well as the
specific author and book.
3. Personal (Personal Essays and Reflections)
I
managed to upload most of my writings that exist in digital format (except of
course those which were handwritten).
1. Given the advent of GenAI, what are the possible impact of bad actors on democracy, human rights and freedom of speech?
2. These are some of my writings over many years. Please speculate and discern my interests and sensibility as well as what you can tell about me.
As an
academic, I have to admit that while Google NotebookLM has many advantages, it
is not without its potential drawbacks. One major concern is the risk of
over-reliance on AI-generated content. As authors, we must remain vigilant to ensure
that our work retains its originality and authenticity. There's a risk that
overuse of NotebookLM could lead to a homogenisation of academic writing
styles, potentially stifling the diverse voices that are crucial to scholarly
discourse.
Another
potential drawback is the issue of privacy. Although NotebookLM operates as a
closed system, uploading sensitive research materials to any cloud-based
platform raises questions about data security and intellectual property rights.
Researchers working on confidential or proprietary information may need to
exercise caution when using such tools.
In
addition, Google is notorious for launching many of its products with great
fanfare and then unceremoniously 'killing' them. I wouldn't be surprised if
NotebookLM suffered the same fate.
Despite
these concerns, I believe that NotebookLM, if used judiciously, can greatly
enhance our productivity and creativity as writers.
Lastly,
I prompted NotebookLM that “I'm asked to write an article on the usage of
Google NotebookLM and how it can revive memories which otherwise left tucked
away. Can you find something which I've written on this matter before.”
To end this article, retrieving a paragraph of a fictional story I wrote more than twenty years back, “I have long come to believe that there is something magical about diary. They have this power of reliving memories which otherwise left in the recesses of the mind, forever lost, forever forgotten…All it takes is a key to unlock them. However this key is no longer a diary but NotebookLM.”
To watch a demo using NotebookLM by the author:











Comments
Post a Comment